A. Demographics

1. Race/Ethnicity
Latino
American Indian/Alaskan
Asian
African American
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian
Other   

2. Gender
Male
Female
Transgender

3. Age

4. Zip Code

5. Professional Title and Credentials

6. Primary Place of Employment
College/University
Public Health Department
CBO, ASO, National AIDS Organization
Other   

B. Overall

Please rate the following:

1. The overall publication:
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent

2. The written content of the publication.
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent

3. The graphic layout of the publication:
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent

4. The ideas expressed in the publication:

5. References:
Poor
Fair
Good
Very Good
Excellent

C. In Your Opinion

1. How effective is The Scarlett Letters in generating conversations about HIV prevention?
Very Effective
Somewhat Effective
Not At All Effective

2. How innovative are the ideas in The Scarlett Letters?
Very Innovative
Somewhat Innovative
Not At All Innovative

3. How satisfied are you with the final product?
Very Satisfied
Somewhat Satisfied
Not At All Satisfied

4. Is the concept of Corpus relevant to the goal or preventing the spread of HIV among gay men?
Very Effective
Somewhat Effective
Not At All Effective

5. How useful is The Scarlett Letters to your own work?
Very Effective
Somewhat Effective
Not At All Effective

D. Additional comments about layout or content

There are now three issues of The Scarlet Letter. Do your responses apply to one issue in particular, or to all issues?

My responses apply to the Social Marketing issue - Winter 2003

My responses apply to the Gay Boy Talk issue - Summer 2003

My responses apply to the Commercial Sex Venue issue - Summer 2004

My responses apply to ALL issues